tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7706313956242830548.post6540214949260113045..comments2023-07-29T04:16:47.364-05:00Comments on Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot.: Mike Tate - Are You Serious?Chris from Racinehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17560905403833094758noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7706313956242830548.post-33107526035554113332011-07-15T08:12:43.239-05:002011-07-15T08:12:43.239-05:00I've been ranting about this same issue in Mic...I've been ranting about this same issue in Michigan... the unnecessary expense of recall campaigns, and who should be held liable for the expense of them. Like Wisconsin, the voters swept out the Democrats everywhere, to give the Republicans total control of the state. As soon as Governor Rick Snyder began enacting the cuts, which the electorate voted Republicans into office for, the Democrats, through their union surrogates, began planning their recall drives of him and many other Republican legislators, mere months into their new terms. <br /><br />There should be a cost to the Democrats, who never seem to accept election results, in which they are unsucessful in rigging into the victory column, and unless the cost of these campaigns are laid at the feet of the political saboteurs, this is going to become their everyday strategy everywhere. These fall in the same category as frivious lawsuits. State law regarding recall campaigns need revamping, with front money for the cost of these crybaby reactions borne by the party stimulating them, NOT the taxpayer! Since it isn't fair to stick the taxpayers with the cost of failed political campaigns, you really have to go the whole 9 yards, and ban public employee unions financing political parties through dues money; also taxpayer funded, and inacted without the consent of individual union members.Garoldhttp://www.facebook.com/?sk=inbox&action=read&tid=307de46958e74d699954fde57efb4c12#!/gee.lembach?sk=wallnoreply@blogger.com